HomeNBAGrading the Brandon Ingram trade: Raptors get a talent, but the move...

Grading the Brandon Ingram trade: Raptors get a talent, but the move raises questions about


An awfully busy Wednesday in the NBA snuck one more big move in before the clock struck midnight ahead of Thursday’s 3 p.m. ET trade deadline, with the New Orleans Pelicans reportedly trading forward Brandon Ingram to the Toronto Raptors in a deal that ends the All-Star forward’s tenure in Louisiana after five and a half seasons — and sets up some pretty interesting decisions come the summer.

ESPN’s Shams Charania reports the Raptors will receive Ingram in exchange for guard Bruce Brown Jr., center Kelly Olynyk, a first-round pick and a second-round pick. According to Blake Murphy of Sportsnet, the first-rounder is the Indiana Pacers’ top-four-protected 2026 pick, which accompanied Brown to Toronto in last year’s Pascal Siakam deal; his colleague Michael Grange reports that the second-rounder will come in 2031.

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - DECEMBER 5:  Brandon Ingram #14 of the New Orleans Pelicans reacts after scoring on a three point basket against the Phoenix Suns during the second half of a game at the Smoothie King Center on December 5, 2024 in New Orleans, Louisiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Derick E. Hingle/Getty Images)NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA - DECEMBER 5:  Brandon Ingram #14 of the New Orleans Pelicans reacts after scoring on a three point basket against the Phoenix Suns during the second half of a game at the Smoothie King Center on December 5, 2024 in New Orleans, Louisiana. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Derick E. Hingle/Getty Images)

After almost — count ’em — six seasons, the Pelicans moved on from Brandon Ingram. (Photo by Derick E. Hingle/Getty Images)

Let’s grade the trade from each team’s perspective, starting north of the border:


Team president Masai Ujiri and general manager Bobby Webster reportedly entered the deadline intent on adding “a significant piece” to kickstart the Raptors’ burgeoning rebuild, with an eye toward halting the franchise’s ongoing decline since the 2019 NBA championship and expediting its climb out of the East’s basement. (The Raptors sit at 16-35, in 13th place in the conference, after Wednesday’s blowout loss to the Grizzlies.) That search landed on Ingram, a spidery swingman with one All-Star nod under his belt and a smooth offensive game that reportedly left Ujiri “intrigued” as a potential complement for the playmaking of All-Star wing Scottie Barnes.

As a pure talent play, there’s a lot to like about Ingram, a gifted all-around scorer and improved facilitator who has averaged 23 points on 47/37/85 shooting splits, 5.5 rebounds and 5.2 assists per game over the past five seasons. There are reasons he spent most of the last year on the trade block, though.

He proved a shaky fit alongside a jumbo point forward with an iffy outside shot in Zion Williamson, which could rear its head again alongside Barnes. One manifestation of the fit issues: the half-court spacing congestion that often resulted from Ingram’s preference for working in the midrange rather than cranking up his 3-point volume, despite strong shooting numbers from the outside.

Ingram’s defensive effort has always left something to be desired when he’s on the court, given his 6-foot-8 frame, 7-foot-3 wingspan and quick feet. He’s also spent quite a bit of time off the court, missing 115 games over the past four seasons — and counting. (A high ankle sprain has kept Ingram on the shelf for the past two months … and, considering Toronto holds the NBA’s fifth-worst record and thus a 42.1% chance at a top-four pick in the 2025 NBA draft, maybe giving him some more time to rest up wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.)

It all adds up to a very good but not great player — an occasional fringe All-Star rather than a consistent All-NBA candidate — which is a pretty tricky type of player to build around under the new collective bargaining agreement. That led to a difference of opinion between Ingram, who’s in the final year of the five-year max extension he signed in 2020, and the Pelicans, who have never in their history paid the luxury tax (and who dipped under the tax earlier Wednesday by trading reserve center Daniel Theis to Oklahoma City), over what his next contract should look like.

That’s now Toronto’s problem to solve — and with Barnes’ maximum-salaried extension of his rookie-scale contract about to kick in, and with fellow starters Immanuel Quickley, RJ Barrett and Jakob Poeltl already on the books for just under $80 million next season, a potentially thorny one. Ingram is reportedly excited about the prospect of a fresh start in Toronto; one wonders, though, if a re-signed Ingram and Barrett would prove duplicative, putting the Raptors in a position where they’d need to try to flip RJ to better balance the roster.

Ingram’s eligible for an extension of up to three additional years and $144 million right now, if Ujiri and Webster want to go that route; if not, the Raptors now have his Bird rights, allowing them to go over the salary cap to retain him when he hits unrestricted free agency in July. Getting off the $13.4 million owed to Olynyk next season creates some more wiggle room under the luxury tax line for Toronto to be able to keep Ingram around … but it still puts the Raptors in line to foot an awfully steep bill for a starting five that looks somewhat ill-fitting, light on shooting, shaky defensively and perhaps not dramatically closer to Ujiri’s stated goal of getting the Raptors back in the mix for consistent contention.

“Sports is only about winning, and nobody cares about anything if you don’t win,” Ujiri told reporters last summer. “You’re irrelevant.”

Adding a talent like Ingram nudges that needle a smidge. Whether it does so enough to justify shelling out draft capital in the midst of what’s felt like an early-stage rebuild, though — and enough to be worth paying the 27-year-old well north of $40 million a year for the privilege — I’m not so sure.


If you’re trading a star, you’d like to come away with salary relief, draft capital and projectable young talent. Well, two out of three ain’t bad.

Brown’s expiring contract will wipe $23 million…



Yahoo Sports

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments